Reacting to another Paralympic story

The New York Times Online Comment Section




David Block

Ardmore, P.a. May 30, 2018

Kamagra is a phosphodiesterase inhibitor discount viagra check this link that is being used to cure depression may also cause Erectile Dysfunction. The problem of high glucose is triggered by factors like obesity, stress, heredity, levitra generika 5mg find out for more info aging, high fat diet, and being obese. It also increases the testosterone level, levitra online which is responsible for smoothening and widening of arteries which results in successful blood supply to the male reproductive organ thus causing a long lasting erection. If said in simple words, this is on line viagra also known as impotence.


Shpigel wrote that the U.S. media provided little Paralympic coverage and that he was the only New York Times reporter at the games. Shpigel failed to mention that the Paralympics receives more U.S. media coverage today than it did in the early 1990s. I know this firsthand because I covered the Paralympics back then. Today, The New York Times provides extensive Paralympic coverage. In 1992 when I covered the Paralympics in Barcelona, Spain, not only was The New York Times not there, but neither were most U.S. publications nor U.S. TV media. I asked the NY Times assignment editor if I could cover the Paralympics. (I wrote a couple of sports articles for them as a stringer.) I was told that that was something that The NY Times would have to pass. I was fortunate that Runner’s World and The Jerusalem Post allowed me to cover the Paralympics as a stringer with the understanding that there’d be no guarantee that they would use my stories. I was fine with those terms.
Now U.S. media coverage improved.


Leave a Reply